Bergkamp At The Movies: Bull Durham
Happy Friday everyone. While it might be getting cold outside, I'm feeling all warm and fuzzy on the inside after watching "Bull Durham." And hey, I think it got a bit of a rise out of Bergkamp Jr., too. That might have something to do with the three back-to-back doing it scenes near the end of the film and the fact that Susan Sarandon was quite a piece of work back in the 80s -- and that you ALMOST see her nipple at one point (remember going over scenes like that with the slow motion function on your VCR when you were younger? Oh, you don't? Me neither). Um, but for those interested in seeing more, watch "Atlantic City." Apart from being a stellar movie, it contains scenes with Sarandon rinsing her body with lemons. Hot!
You can't blame me for the perverted start to this post, cause sex is what "Bull Durham" is all about. And baseball. I know what you're thinking, baseball AND sex? Where's the connection? Heyo!
Well, writer/director Ron Shelton seems to think they have quite a bit in common. Based on some of his own experiences as a former minor league baseball player, "Bull Durham" revolves essentially around the rise of talented young pitcher Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh (Tim Robbins) and the struggles of "Crash" Davis (Kevin Costner), who's nearing the end of his career as he fights to keep playing. And also Annie (Sarandon), a groupie/mentor who they both really want to nail.
An older friend of mine who I play softball with recommended the film to me last summer. He called it one of the best baseball movies ever made. And there's a lot to like about it. I don't actually think it's very laugh-out-loud funny as it was credited upon release, but maybe that's cause I'm not a big fan of the romantic comedy genre. But then again, it's not unfunny and it's not a typical romantic comedy. And it's the use of baseball as a narrative device -- or my bias for liking movies that use baseball as a narrative device -- that makes it so good. I'd say it scores another triple on my retarded rating system.
As with "Bang the Drum Slowly," you get to follow a team on the road. And behind-the-scenes shit is always kinda awesome cause it tries to give you a glimpse of what the players are thinking and reacting to what happens on the field. (A highlight is Crash Davis' inner dialogue while at the plate.) Is it really like that in real life, though? Watching some of the interviews with former real-life Durham Bulls players (they are a real team and the movie was filmed at their actual stadium) in the bonus features, they said it was pretty accurate with the exception of the scene where LaLoosh is banging a groupie in the locker room before game time. That kinda stuff apparently never happened. Sure it didn't.
Sometimes I wonder about how setting the film in the Minor Leagues makes it any different. Could the story not have also worked had they set it in the Majors? Perhaps. But I the more I think about it, it's what makes the movie that much cooler. We all make jokes about seeing Jays getting sent to Syracuse to die. But is it really that bad? I figure, as long as you're playing baseball and making a bit of coin, life can't be all that terrible. I guess it depends on the situation, and that's what "Bull Durham" does so well. No one on the team seems terminally depressed about being there but as soon as Crash Davis talks about his short stint in the Majors, the other players lose their minds and want to know all the details.
It kinda makes me think of that story the National Post did on Josh Towers about his time in Syracuse. Players there said he was just obsessive about following the Jays while he played as a Chief. That always seemed like it might be somewhat of an insult to your teammates to be bemoaning the fact that you're stuck in the same situation as some dudes who might never play a Major League game in their life. Then again, I can fully appreciate that Russ Adams might not be the most cheerful of teammates. And that's where Kevin Costner's character really nails it. He thinks the Minor League is bullshit -- he's on pace to break the Minor League homerun record and doesn't seem to give a flying fuck -- but he loves baseball and if it means grinding it out in the Minors to play it, so be it.
And that's kinda the awesome thing about the film being based on a Minor League team and the Minor League in general for that matter. In some ways, there's more heart. True, supporters of a Minor League team might not have the option of watching a Major League team, but they still go for a love of the game. And they can get a decent seat for a decent price and probably buy decent beer at a decent price, too. I know jumbotrons must've been mind blowing wh
en they first came out, but I think it'd be pretty fucking rad to watch a game without one in a modestly sized stadium. Now, I've only been to one Minor League game and that's when the Calgary Cannons existed. I don't remember being blown away, but it was a good time. And we've already addressed the fact that the Jays' farm teams seem to care about their fans more than the Jays do for Toronto (I swear these movie reviews aren't just an attempt for me to link to past posts I wrote). Basically, it's the players, the fans and even the managers and owners (the Durham Bulls' owner gave full access to the stadium and players for the film crew. ... OK, I know it's in his best interests on a promotional level but fuck, I'm trying not to be cynical here) who all bring the love to the game, despite being in a league that few people care about.
Not to get all fruity, but it's this feeling of love from all aspects of the game that resonate so strongly in every scene of "Bull Durham" and make it such a good flick. A love of baseball. And fucking.


32 rational and reasonable comments:
whatever, virgin.
"The Babe" is a helluva bassball and womanizing flic
I'm pretty see Sarandon's tits in Joe, and that's a fucking great movie, and she was probably 19 or something at the time.
I see her tits every night. Every old and saggy night.
Minor Leagues and their parks are sweet because of their charm (ake shittiness.) I've been trying to catch 5 or 6 different parks a year over the last few years. Everything is cheap, and the players are pretty accessible. It's a better place...you know.....a place where Ryan Roberts can be a 5-tool stud.
Fuck off Parkes
Fuck off Anonymous.
What the fuck are the Indians thinking picking up Tomo "has been" Ohka
They obviously know that Clif Lee is a fluke and he was managed to a Cy Young by his ...er..manager. Me Bitter? no...
http://hotstove.mlblogs.com/archives/2008/12/ricciardi_it_looks_like_were_g.html
Movies might be the best thing to happen between apr-sept next year.
It just seems gloomy in BJ world. Baseball I mean.
C+
I expect more. Your arguments are rambling, incoherent, tough to read. You need more polish.
Bergkamp = funny
Parkes = clever
Stoeten = creepy
Anon = genius
Who recommended the flick? I want names!
Dan
Holy fuck guys, I might have to give up my DJF duties after the horrible burns I was just subjected to. It's going to be a long, painful recovery. Pray for me.
What does Wilner think?
Oh ya, Bull Durham is a classic for a sports movie.
I don't think it would have worked if it was set in MLB though. Costner's character had to be poor and at the end of the line to make the story work.
Good stuff.
I've never seen the movie but I've seen a lot of Bull Durin' the Jays 2008 season.
Ricciardi looking at life without Burnett
J.P. Ricciardi sounds like he's ready to move on without free-agent pitcher A.J. Burnett.
The Blue Jays general manager said in an interview Thursday with the Canadian Press that "it looks like we're going to lose Burnett," and replacing him with a hurler of comparable skills may not be possible given Toronto's new payroll restraints.
Ricciardi made the comments days before baseball's winter meetings, the annual forum for wheeling and dealing that begins next week in Las Vegas.
Burnett, 31, opted out of the final two years of his five-year, $55-million US contract with the Toronto Blue Jays.
Ricciardi admitted last week that his spending may be slowed in the wake of the global financial crisis and the falling loonie, making it possible that the Jays' payroll could drop from the $97 million US it was at in 2008.
The Canadian Press reported that Ricciardi will have in the neighbourhood of $84 million to spend, with $70 million of that already committed to 11 players. Factoring in raises due to other players on the roster, the Blue Jays will be left with little room to manoeuvre once things get going in Vegas.
So if Ricciardi manages to re-sign Burnett — a trick that may be even tougher to turn now that the Atlanta Braves have confirmed they've made him an offer, said by the Atlanta Journal Constitution to be for four years plus an option worth at least $15 million US annually — the GM won't have room to plug the other holes on his roster.
If Burnett doesn't re-sign, Ricciardi probably won't have the means to add a big-ticket free agent to take his place.
That means a team needing help both offensively and on the mound will only be able to focus on one area, and Ricciardi indicated which one that will be.
"I think more of the pitching because it looks like we're going to lose Burnett," he said. "We don't know where Burnett is going to go, but we've got to assume Burnett's going to be gone. [Shaun] Marcum is out for the year and [Dustin] McGowan won't be back until May, so to start the season, three-fifths of our starting rotation is out."
.the Jays have the money to re-sign Burnett, but if they don't re-sign him then they don't have the money to sign someone else. I don't understand that.
what makes you think that the jays have the desire to spend the money to sign burnett? that the team's position that it has enough $ to sign burnett is anything more than lip service for a player they know they're not going to re-sign anyways?
calgary cannons ... awesome ... keep the reviews coming ...
cheers,
bart.
you should have the Harvey's Advert for the Canadian Back Bacon Burger on this site, not just The Scores'. DJF would be more delicious
I think every Friday they should have a Harvey's ad up.
Parkes = Clever
Bergkamp = Funny
Stoeten = Smart
It's a formula that works.
I like to think of myself more as the asshole.
I have no idea how the sales department stuff works, or why some ads are on the Score itself, and some are on the blog network. Some companies don't want anything to do with blogs, I don't think. Seems like a page view is a page view to me, but what do I know? I think the next ad is going to be for the new Jim Carrey movie, so I guess I should get all my shitting on him out of my system, eh? I think I'm safe to say that Nickelback fucking sucks gigantic boiling loads now, though.
Forget Susan Sarandon's nipple, we got to see Kevin Costner's nipple. Schwing!!
"(remember going over scenes like that with the slow motion function on your VCR when you were younger?...)"
Does yesterday count? I was younger yesterday. And I just got my VCR fixed, so I can once again do what you described.
You're all assholes. Parkes has ideas, Bergkamp has humor and Stoeten has attitude. Together it's a lethal force.
^^^ May be entitled to royalties when we film our Charley's Angels-style DJF crime drama.
Cannons? I see an angry cock spewing forth. Signed, every feminazi
My favorite baseball book is The Boys of Summer. Roger Kahn wrote that and another book I enjoyed about life in the minors: Good Enough to dream.
"In 1983, the best-selling author is looking to purchase a minor-league team and ends up with the Utica Blue Sox in the Class A short-season New York-Penn League.
Without an affiliation with a major-league club that can stock the club with up-and-coming rookies and help underwrite other expenses, Kahn builds his team with minor-league cast-offs and undrafted players."
If only the Durham Bulls had a catchy theme song like "Go Nuts, Lugnuts".
Post a Comment